Legal
categories and ontology.
This paper
will attempt to critically discuss two (personae
and res) of the three basic legal categories of Roman law: personae, res, actiones, in light of
modern scientific developments and classical
ontological conceptualizations of nature. It will not intend to provide answers
but only to frame the debate in its historical and philosophical dimensions and
attempt to draw what would be relevant conclusions for legal theory.
The
'inefficacy' of human rights universalism and the relativism of cultural norms
This
paper will discuss in which sense human rights theory has been
considered universal and in which way legal and
cultural norms differ and are relative to determined cultures. Usually
this questioning goes into the wider debate of legal pluralism and of
general versus particular jurisprudence.
But in the specific what this paper will interrogate is whether
the 'inefficacy' of human rights has to be attributed to the presuppositions
pertaining to the theory of human rights and the western tradition of law from
where it comes from or if other elements
sometimes more simple such as incorrect enforcement or other more substantial elements from a
cultural point of view play a major role.
And if so why and in which way.
No comments:
Post a Comment